Falling trust in government hurts major parties at the ballot box
Article highlights
Collapsing trust in politicians is fuelling a rise in protest politics, according to a new report from Australia's @GrattanInst
Share articleIf major parties and politicians want to rebuild trust with voters, they’ll need to change the way they do politics, says @GrattanInst
Share articleAustralians are not satisfied with politics as usual, says @GrattanInst. Major parties should seek to restore trust and social cohesion
Share articlePartnering for Learning
We put our vision for government into practice through learning partner projects that align with our values and help reimagine government so that it works for everyone.
Protest politics is on the rise in Australia, and the main cause is collapsing trust in politicians and the major parties, according to our new report for Grattan Institute.
A crisis of trust says that if the major parties and politicians want to rebuild trust with voters, they'll need to change the way they do politics: stop misusing their entitlements, strengthen political donations laws, tighten regulation of lobbyists, and slow the revolving door between political offices and lobbying positions.
They will need to stop over-promising and under-delivering, on everything from reducing power bills to making houses more affordable and developing regional Australia. And the major parties will need to increase the size of their 'gene pool', by preselecting candidates who have broader work experience than being political staffers or union officials.
Voting patterns
The vote share for minor parties and independents has been rising for a decade. At the 2016 federal election, it hit its highest level since the Second World War. More than one-in-four Australians voted for someone other than the ALP, the LNP or the Greens in the Senate. First-preference Senate votes for minor parties and 'outsider' candidates leapt from 12% in 2004 to 26% in 2016. And voters in regional and remote areas are particularly disillusioned. The further from a city centre, the higher the minor party vote and the faster it has risen.
Voter disillusionment with the political establishment is the major cause of the rise in protest politics; it's an "anyone but them" vote. Voters for 'outsider' politicians such as Pauline Hanson, Jacqui Lambie, Derryn Hinch and Nick Xenophon have much lower trust in government than those who vote for the majors. Australians increasingly believe politicians look after themselves and government is run by a few big interests rather than in the public interest. More than 70% of Australians think our system of government needs reform. Voters are choosing parties and candidates that promise to "drain the swamp".
It's no longer all about the economy
Economic factors are less important. The rise in the minor party vote doesn't seem to be about stagnant wages or rising inequality: the vote grew most strongly when real wages were rising and inequality wasn't. And the biggest increase in the minor party vote was between 2010 and 2013 - a period when Australians were particularly optimistic about their immediate financial future.
But that doesn't mean economics is irrelevant. The minor party vote increased as unemployment rose, and minor party voters are more likely to have negative views about globalisation and free trade. The protectionist economic policies of many minor parties may, therefore, account for some of their appeal. Some of their anti-globalisation and 'Australia first' rhetoric also taps into broader cultural anxiety about the pace and direction of change.
The loss of economic and cultural power in the regions looms large in regional voters' dissatisfaction. Regions hold a falling share of Australia's population, and consequently of the nation's economy. Australia's cultural symbols are becoming more city-centric - from mateship to multiculturalism, The Man from Snowy River to MasterChef. Regional voters increasing fear they are being ‘left behind' and that ‘the Australian way of life is under threat'. The rhetoric and policies of some minor parties tap into these concerns and values.
No more politics as usual
The rising minor party vote sends a signal to our major party politicians: Australians are not satisfied with politics as usual. Major parties seeking to increase their appeal should focus on what matters to voters: restoring trust and social cohesion.
It will be a slow process. A period of leadership stability and policy delivery could go a long way. And improving the way we do our politics could help reduce the incidence of trust-sapping scandals and reassure the public that the system is working for them.
Politicians should also seek to dampen rather than inflame cultural differences. Politicians can lead by stressing the common ground between city and country and between communities with different backgrounds.
Failure to heed the warning will mean more elections where Australians unleash their displeasure at the ballot box.
What is legitimacy to you? Where do you see legitimacy working well? How governments work with citizens to build legitimacy is a big question for CPI.
Find out how to get involved in our Finding Legitimacy project
FURTHER READING
- Finding legitimacy - CPI is starting a global conversation for better outcomes. Nadine Smith introduces a new research programme about legitimacy from the Centre for Public Impact.
- Competence, fairness, and caring - the three keys to government legitimacy. UCL's Amanda Greene pinpoints competence, fairness, and caring as key factors in helping governments secure their legitimacy.
- Introducing the Finding Legitimacy regional champions. We meet the regional champions of CPI's #FindingLegitimacy project
- Why you cannot fix legitimacy but you can mend it. How can governments reconnect with their citizens? Nadine Smith explains why there is is no catch-all fix but instead a continuous journey of improvement
- If no news is good news, what is fake news? With fake news increasingly part of the public discourse, Nadine Smith examines how governments can start to strengthen its own credibility rating.
- Public impact in a post-truth world. Governments have struggled for years to understand that people's perceptions of life are very often their reality, says Adrian Brown, who suggests that “post-truth” can simply mean “truth” from a different vantage point
- Why we shouldn't panic over post-truth. Nadine Smith explains why policymakers should understand how to adapt messages so that people feel connected to them.