It’s not enough for government simply to provide good customer service and deliver products and services efficiently, says Peter HughesShare article
Efficiency and customer service only go so far in ensuring that interventions are effective. #FutureGovernmentShare article
For Peter Hughes, public service is about three things - putting citizens first, humility and having a higher purposeShare article
Partnering for Learning
We put our vision for government into practice through learning partner projects that align with our values and help reimagine government so that it works for everyone.
Peter Hughes, the New Zealand State Services Commissioner, talked to Adrian Brown and Larry Kamener.
It's not enough for government simply to provide good customer service and deliver products and services efficiently. That's the rallying cry of Peter Hughes, New Zealand's State Services Commissioner, who argues that governments should complement managerial efficiency with a greater focus on effectiveness and a reinvigoration of the spirit of public service.
“It's the difference between focusing on the ‘bottom-line' and the ‘top-line',” Hughes explains. “The bottom-line is about delivering outputs as efficiently as possible and being accountable for that delivery. For example, benefit payments should be of the right amount, made on the right day and to the right person. The top-line, however, speaks to effectiveness and outcomes, such as whether a jobseeker finds sustainable employment.”
New Zealand has long been seen as a pioneer of public sector reform. It was at the forefront of the so-called “new public management” reforms of the 1980s and 1990s that separated policy and operations functions, introduced stronger performance management and encouraged competition wherever possible. Hughes is now challenging some of the limitations of this managerialist mindset.
“Efficiency and customer service only go so far in ensuring that interventions are effective. A swift job placement that does not result in sustained employment cannot be considered a good outcome for the jobseeker. To understand whether a service is effective we need to take a longer-term view, which is not something the current system encourages.”
Efficiency and customer service only go so far in ensuring that interventions are effective
But taking the longer view is only part of the solution. According to Hughes, tackling managerial silos is just as important: “Solving complex societal problems often requires a range of interventions centred on a particular individual, family or community. This almost always requires collaboration between agencies that are run as vertical hierarchies with few incentives to work together.”
If anything, agencies are actively prevented from collaborating thanks to rules about data-sharing, budget management and staffing. “Simply put, we are not set up to deliver better outcomes, and many of the levers are scattered across government and beyond. We need to operate across the system, not just down the vertical silos.
We need to operate across the system, not just down the vertical silos
“Over the past ten years, my predecessors have put various things in place that have enabled us to be more joined up and responsive. We are better placed to tackle complex challenges than in the past but to achieve properly sustainable results we really have to strain against the architecture, accountability and system design of government. We now have an opportunity, with the change of government in New Zealand, to change the legislative basis upon which government is operating.”
For Hughes, this is far more than a technocratic exercise. “Sitting behind the 1990s reforms was a very utilitarian view of the public service. It saw public service as the delivery arm of government - and a contestable one at that. This is fine in terms of service delivery, and we saw real gains in that area, but what we lost was a sense of being part of something bigger, with a higher purpose, with a moral purpose. In many ways, I think, we lost our heart.”
This is what Hughes calls the “spirit of service” and it's a powerful message that resonates strongly with frontline staff. Hughes's own career began more than 35 years ago years as a clerk with the then Department of Social Welfare. “They put me on the front desk, and I absolutely loved that work. I found it hugely meaningful, and I thought I was making a difference.
“I'm not one of those who believes that the public service is simply the delivery arm of the executive branch of government. I am somebody who believes the public service is a special part of our constitutional democracy that helps to reinforce the legitimacy of the government.”
I am somebody who believes the public service is a special part of our constitutional democracy that helps to reinforce the legitimacy of the government.
In an era characterised by disengagement from government, not just in New Zealand but around the world, Hughes sees the spirit of service as an important response to the challenge of rebuilding trust and confidence in public institutions. “Most public servants are doing sensible things, it is just that they are working within a managerial frame where they are required to make decisions on the basis of utility, rather than within an ethical frame. Bringing that ethical frame to bare is going to be really significant.”
For Hughes, public service is about three things. “The first thing is putting the needs of others first. It's about opening our hearts, minds and energies to the needs of others. It's about being totally focused on the customer, client or citizen. Secondly, it's about bringing the right attitude to that. Not that we are subservient in any way, but we approach our work with humility and the desire to serve others, to be of service to others.
“Finally, it's absolutely about having a higher purpose. It's about being motivated by something bigger than ourselves. The desire to use our skills and our talents to make our world, and within it our country, our families, our communities, a better place.”
The Future of Government
At the Centre for Public Impact, we're exploring and debating the implications of enablement as part of our Future of Government project. Contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org if you work in the public sector or in government and would like to contribute your thoughts and reactions to this debate.
We're speaking to government leaders, civil servants and public sector workers around the world to understand how they're thinking about the future and shaping their organisations for the challenges ahead.
- The Future of Government: CPI is exploring what the future of government should look like and what it will do. Help shape what comes next.
- Reinventing government starts at local level: Terry Moran has been an outspoken critic of managerialism in policymaking, but should we reject these models completely?
- [Terry Moran Speech] An Oration in Honour of Jim Carlton AO: In honour of the late Jim Carlton (AO), Terry Moran shares what he's calling Australia's third long wave of reform.
- Transforming Education in Malaysia: From Blueprint to Practice: Madam Khadijah Abdullah of PADU shares lessons learnt from Malaysia's blueprint to transform child education.
- Enablement: how governments can achieve more by letting go: The traditional service delivery model is increasingly being challenged by an enablement mindset.
- For more efficient government, don't start with efficiency. Christian Bason tells us why we need to start with what citizens value, but has government lost sight of what that is?
- Less management, more care: a Dutch nursing revolution reaches the UK: Brendan Martin tells us how he plans to spread the Buurtzorg model to the UK and beyond and revolutionise nursing with the enablement mindset.
- The Future of Government is moral, says Victoria's most senior civil servant: Chris Eccles tells us why he feels the moral dimension of government has never been expressly articulated.
- What's next? A design journey into the Future of Government: Lack of diversity at the top, austerity, and simplified metrics - Elena Bagnera explores the obstacles to building citizens' trust in government.